Back

Competition

Competition

 

LINK

  

Last month I took part in an architectural competition as a jury member. While analyzing the projects, I caught myself returning to one key question: how is this project different from dozens of similar ones?

Many submissions contain everything required: analysis of insolation, transportation, noise, wind, and technical schemes.
But what is often missing is the most important thing an understanding of who this project is for and what value it creates in the market.

Architecture is not visual art. It is a business tool that must respond both to society and to the investor.

A strong project is built not on materials and décor, but on life scenarios, attention, emotions, and attraction  and on maintaining the core idea from concept to implementation. This is how I understand architecture of attraction: architecture that works for value, demand, and recognizability.